Ethiopia’s Red Sea Access: A Historical Oversight
Addis Ababa, October 31, 2025 (ENA) – The House of People’s Representatives (HPR) of Ethiopia has categorically labeled the nation’s exclusion from access to the Red Sea as a significant historical oversight. This decision has been deemed detrimental not only to Ethiopia’s economic prospects but also to its political sovereignty.
Implications of Sea Access on Sovereignty
Deputy Speaker of the HPR, Lomi Bedo, expressed to ENA that restricting Ethiopia’s access to maritime routes is an “unfair” action that undermines the nation’s political independence. This perspective highlights the deep-seated implications of being landlocked, as it influences Ethiopia’s sovereignty and long-term national interests.
Lomi emphasized that the ramifications of lacking direct sea access extend beyond mere economic factors. They deeply intertwine with Ethiopia’s policy autonomy, indicating a need for a comprehensive approach to address these challenges.
Peaceful Diplomatic Efforts
The Ethiopian government is taking proactive steps to address this long-standing issue, pursuing resolution through peaceful and reciprocal means. According to Lomi, diplomatic efforts are being conducted in full alignment with international law and established diplomatic protocols.
“The government has adopted a peaceful and lawful approach to ensure Ethiopia’s fair use of the Red Sea,” asserted Lomi, appealing to citizens to rally behind these diplomatic initiatives aimed at securing access to the sea.
International Acknowledgment of Rights
Messeret Haile, the HPR’s Deputy Government Whip, further affirmed that Ethiopia’s claim to sea access is recognized by the international community. His comments underline the legitimacy of Ethiopia’s quest for maritime routes via peaceful dialogue, emphasizing that this goal is not just a political stance but a recognized right.
International Law and Coastal Access
Fathi Mahdi, Deputy Chairperson of the HPR Standing Committee on Foreign Relations and Peace Affairs, also underscored the legal obligations of coastal states under international law to grant landlocked countries like Ethiopia access to ports for trade. “Ethiopia’s goal is to secure sea access through peaceful and diplomatic means,” Fathi stated, reinforcing the country’s unwavering commitment to achieving this vital national objective.
Legislative Support for Diplomatic Initiatives
The HPR pledges continued support for the government’s diplomatic endeavors by developing relevant legislation that facilitates parliamentary diplomacy and systematically reviews current national policies. Lomi reiterated that this support is crucial for legitimizing and strengthening Ethiopia’s claims on the international stage.
By raising awareness and fostering dialogue around these issues, Ethiopia aims to cultivate a more robust position regarding its rights to maritime access, facilitating better trade opportunities and enhancing national sovereignty.
Further Reading
- Ethiopian Sovereignty and Economic Development
- International Law on Maritime Rights
- Diplomacy in Landlocked Nations
This issue remains a focal point of political discourse in Ethiopia, reflecting broader themes of sovereignty, national pride, and economic strategy. As the negotiations continue, the commitment to achieving fair access to the Red Sea through peaceful means will be paramount for Ethiopia’s future.
